SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Cal) 207

AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI, AMARESH ROY
INCOME-TAX OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
CALCUTTA CHROMOTYPE PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SEN GUPTA, B.K.BACHAWAT, P.P.GINWALA, Pronab Pal

AMARESH ROY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is on behalf of the revenue and has arisen out of an order made by our learned brother, T. K. Basu J. , in Matter No. 53 of 1967, by which order his Lordship has granted a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the revenue who were the respondents before his Lordship to "forthwith recall, cancel and withdraw the notice dated the 16th November, 1966, issued by the respondent No. 1 and a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondents to forbear from giving any effect to the said notice. The respondents would, however, be at liberty to proceed according to law". That order allowing the reliefs prayed for in an application under Article 226 of the Constitution arose in the following circumstances : the respondent before us, Calcutta Chromotype (Private) Ltd. , is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and carries on business, inter alia, as manufacturers of playing cards, printers and lithographers. The assessment of the total income for the year 1960-61, under Section 23 (3) of the Indian Income-tax, 1922, was computed at Rs. 1. 62,271. After assessment for the year 1960-61 was completed by the Income-tax Officer, they








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top