SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Cal) 304

A.K.SINHA, KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
JAGDISH PRASAD TULSAN – Appellant
Versus
MANJULA TULSAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Dutt, BHASKAR SEN, P.L.KHAITAN, SAILENDRA BHUSAN BAKSHI, SUBRATA ROY CHAUDHURI

A. K. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is husband's appeal against an order passed by the trial Court granting permanent alimony to the wife under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Brief outline of the admitted facts and circumstances under which this appeal arises is as follows :

( 2 ) PARTIES who are Hindus were married on 1st December, 1964. Shortly thereafter within about 7 or 8 months, the husband filed a petition for judicial separation against the wife on a number of allegations of cruelty as also desertion. While this proceeding was pending, upon her application the wife was allowed interim maintenance by the trial Court at the rate of Rs. 350 per month, which, however, on appeal to this Court was enhanced to Rs. 500 per month. On March 22, 1967 a decree for judicial separation was passed ex parte as the wife though filed written statement did not contest the proceeding at the hearing. On 14th June. 1967, the wife made an application for permanent alimony and claimed Rs. 1,500 per month After about lapse of 2 years thereafter the application for permanent alimony, though contested by the husband, was allowed and a sum of Rs. 500 per month was granted to the wife. This is how, in s







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top