SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Cal) 31

M.M.DUTT, ARUN KUMAR MUKHERJEE
SAILENDRA NATH GHOSAL – Appellant
Versus
ENA DUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Himadri Sankar Majumdar, MADAN MOHAN GHOSH, R.K.BHATTACHARJI, S.C.DAS GUPTA

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under Clause (15) of the Letters Patent against the judgment of our learned brother Salil Kumar Dutt. J. Is at the instance of the defendant in a suit for ejectment.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff instituted a suit JEor ejectment against the defendant on the ground of reasonable requirement of the suit premises. The case of the plaintiff was that the defendant had been a tenant under one Biswanath Mallick in respect of the suit premises which is the ground floor of premises No. 89/a, Garpar Road, Calcutta at a monthly rent of Rs. 28/- payable according to the English Calendar month. The plaintiff purchased the premises no. 89/a. Garpar Road from Its owner for valuable consideration by a registered conveyance dated February 18, 1966. As the plaintiff required the suit premises for her own use and occupation, she determined the tenancy of the defendant by a notice to quit and that the defendant, not having vacated the suit premises in terms of the notice, the suit was instituted by the plaintiff for ejectment of the defendant from the suit pre-mises.

( 3 ) THE defendant denied that the plaintiff was the owner of the suit pre-mises. It was alleged by the defen









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top