HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
B. C. Mitra, A. K. Sinha
GOKULANANDA ROY - Appellant
Versus
TARAPADA MUKHARJEE - Respondent
A. F. O. O. 333 Of 1970 (Mandamus Appeal)
Decided On : FEBRUARY 25, 1972
COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY ACT, 1952 - SECTIONS 3, 4 - CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 - ARTICLES 154(1), 356 - WEST BENGAL - PROCLAMATION UNDER ARTICLE 356 - DELEGATION OF POWERS - VALIDITY - INQUIRY INTO DISTURBANCES - PARALLEL INQUIRY - CONTEMPT OF COURT - JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, a member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), was elected to the Legislative Assembly in 1969. Following a hartal called by the appellant's party, violent incidents occurred in Burdwan, resulting in the death of three persons. The Governor visited Burdwan and ordered an inquiry under Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. The appellant challenged the validity of the order, contending that the Governor had no authority to issue the order and that the inquiry would amount to interference with the course of justice.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the Governor had the authority to issue the order appointing the Commission of Inquiry, as the President had delegated all the functions of the State Government and all the powers vested in or exercisable by the Governor to the Governor by notification G. S. R. No. 491. The Court also held that the inquiry would not amount to interference with the course of justice, as the subject-matter of the inquiry was different from the subject-matter of the criminal proceedings against the appellant.
Issues: 1. Whether the Governor had the authority to issue the order appointing the Commission of Inquiry? 2. Whether the inquiry would amount to interference with the course of justice?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The President had delegated all the functions of the State Government and all the powers vested in or exercisable by the Governor to the Governor by notification G. S. R. No. 491. This delegation included the power to appoint a Commission of Inquiry under Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. 2. The subject-matter of the inquiry was different from the subject-matter of the criminal proceedings against the appellant. The inquiry was to investigate the causes of the disturbances in Burdwan, while the criminal proceedings were to determine whether the appellant was guilty of a criminal offence.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed.
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated June 22, 1970, by which the appellant's application for a Rule Nisi for appropriate Writs and orders against certain notifications, appointing a Commission of Inquiry to enquire into certain matters, was dismissed. Although no Rule was issued, notice was directed to be served on the second and third respondents, who appeared at the hearing of the application and contested the s;tme. The appellant claims to be a member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and as such contested a by-election from Raina, District Burdwan and was elected a Member of the Legislative Assembly in 1969.
( 2 ) ON March 16, 1970, Shri Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, who was the Chief Minister of the then United Front Ministry resigned. This resignation was followed by a Hartal, called by the appellant's party. The call for Hartal was opposed by a number of political parties who constituted the then United Front. This call for Hartal, and the opposition to the same, provoked a number of violent incidents at Burdwan near the house of some persons known as Sains. These incidents resulted in the death of three persons including two members of the Sain family. In consequence of the Violent incidents the Governor visited Burdwan on March 30, 1970.
( 3 ) THE Governor's visit to Burdwan was followed by an order dated April 28, 1970, under Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. By this order, the first respondent was directed to hold an inquiry in accordance with the terms and conditions of the order which ran as follows:--"whereas the Governor is of opinion that it is necessary that an enquiry should be made into the following definite matter of public importance, namely, the disturbances which occurred in and around the house of the Sains at Burdwan, on the 17th March 1970 resulting in the death of three persons and injury to several others, and destruction of property; and whereas no Commission of Enquiry has been appointed by the Central Government to enquire into the aforesaid matter; now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by Section 3 of the Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952 (Act 60 of 1952), the Governor is pleased hereby to appoint a Commission of Enquiry consisting of Shri Tarapada Mukhujee, retired Judge of the Calcutta High Court, to enquire into the aforesaid matter with reference to the following points, namely:-- (1) What were the causes which led to the incident at Burdwan on the 17th March, 1970 resulting in the death of three persons and injury to several others; (2) were the police and other local officials negligent in the discharge of their duty to prevent the occurrence and to protect the lives, person and property of the persons killed and injured; (3) if the answer to the question No. 2 is in the affirmative, what were the causes of this negligence and dereliction of duty; (4) any other matter relevant to or incidental to the above question which the Commission may deem fit and proper to investigate; and to submit to the State Government a report embodying its findings, and its recommendations thereon within three months from the date of publications of this notification in the Calcutta Gazette. The Commission of Inquiry, from time to time may appoint one or more assessors to assist and advice it on any matter connected with the aforesaid enquiry. "
( 4 ) THE resignation tendered by Shri Mukherjee as mentioned earlier, was accepted by the Governor on March 19, 1970 and on the same day a Proclamation was issued by the President of India, assuming to himself all the functions of the Government of the State, and all powers vested in or exercisable by the Governor of the State. The notification by which a Proclamation was made was numbered G. S. R. 490. The substance of this Proclamation is that the President assumed to himself the functions of the Government of the State and all powers vested in the Governor, and he declared that the powers o
REFERRED TO : Daluram Pannalal Modi v. Asst. Commr. of Sales Tax
Saibal Kumar Gupta v. B. K. Sen
Supreme Court Jang Bahadur Singh v. Baijnath Tiwari
Tukaram G. Gaokar v. R. M. Shukla
Gyan Chand v. State of Haryana
P.V.Jagannath Rao v. State of Orissa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.