AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
DWIJAPADA HALDAR – Appellant
Versus
PRAFULLA CHANDRA HALDAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Rule is directed against an appellate order passed in an appeal under Section 9 (6) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. A short and interesting point arises for consideration in the present Rule is, whether an application for pre-emption under Section 8 (1) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is liable to be rejected when a co-sharer of a holding made a short deposit of the consideration money at the time of filing such application.
( 2 ) THE petitioner filed an application under Section 8 (1) of the Act and deposited Rs. 750/- being the value of the land as stated in the kobala, hut he did not deposit Rs. 250/- being the value of the structure mentioned in the Conveyance because, according to him, there was no structure on the land, as such the value of the structure stated in the kobala was a fictitious one. The Revenue Officer dismissed the petitioner's application for preemption on two grounds viz. , that the required consideration money was not deposited by the petitioner and the lands were not agricultural lands. On appeal, the appellate tribunal found that the lands were agricultural lands but
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.