HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, JANAH AND SHARMA
SHRI SUNIT PRAMANIK - Appellant
Versus
SANTIPUR INDUSTRIES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. - Respondent
Civil Revn. Case 966 Of 1972
Decided On : AUGUST 9, 1972
LIMITATION ACT - APPEAL - SECTION 4, 12(2) - BENGAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1940 - SECTION 134(2) - FOURTH SCHEDULE - PERIOD OF LIMITATION FOR APPEAL - EXCLUSION OF TIME TAKEN FOR OBTAINING CERTIFIED COPY OF AWARD AND PERIOD OF COURT CLOSURE - INTERPRETATION OF STATUTORY PROVISIONS.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed an appeal against an arbitration award under the Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940. The Assistant Registrar dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation. The petitioner challenged the order before the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the appeal was within time. It held that the period taken for obtaining a certified copy of the award and the period of court closure during the Puja Vacation could be excluded while computing the limitation period. The Court also held that the provisions of the Limitation Act, including Sections 4 and 12(2), applied to the appeal.
Issues: 1. Whether the period taken for obtaining a certified copy of the award could be excluded while computing the limitation period for filing an appeal under the Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940? 2. Whether the period of court closure during the Puja Vacation could be excluded while computing the limitation period? 3. Whether the provisions of the Limitation Act applied to the appeal under the Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act provides for the exclusion of the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the order appealed from while computing the period of limitation for an appeal. 2. Section 4 of the Limitation Act provides that where the prescribed period for any appeal expires on a day when the Court is closed, the appeal may be preferred on the day when the Court re-opens. 3. Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act provides that the provisions of Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act apply to the period of limitation prescribed by any special or local law, including the Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the order of the Assistant Registrar, and directed the Assistant Registrar to entertain and decide the appeal on its merits.
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution. An Arbitrator (Shri B. Chartterjee, Inspector of Co-operative Societies, Santipur Development Block (Fulia), Nadia), appointed under the provisions of the Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940, gave his judgment and award in Dispute Case No. 108n of 1969-70 on the 3rd January, 1971. The petitioner's case is that the Arbitrator issued a gist of the award on April 10, 1971. The petitioner received the said gist on the 16th April, 1971. Then the petitioner applied on the 23rd April, 1971, to the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Nadia, for a certified copy of the judgment and award. The Assistant Registrar by a letter dated the 24th August, 1971, requisitioned stamps for supply of the certified copy of the judgment and award. On the following day, namely, the 25th August, 1971, the petitioner deposited the requisite stamps for the certified copy. The petitioner received the certified copy on the 11th September, 1971. The petitioner sent the memorandum of appeal on the 26th September, 1971, to the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Nadia. The Puja Vacation intervened thereafter and continued till the 4th October, 1971. The Office of the Assistant Registrar received the memorandum of appeal on the 5th October, 1971.
( 2 ) SECTION 134 of the Bengal Cooperative Societies Act makes provisions for appeals. It runs thus:"134. (1) An appeal shall lie from an-order shown in column 2 of the Fourth Schedule to the authority shown in column 3 and column 4 thereof. (2) Save as provided in this Act, no appeal shall lie against any order, decision or award passed in accordance with this Act, and every such order, decision or award shall be final. " serial No. 7 in the Fourth Schedule to the Act provides for the appeal we are concerned with in this application. The period of limitation for this appeal is "one month from the date on which the order, decision or award was communicated to the person aggrieved. "
( 3 ) IN the instant case, in view of the relevant provisions in the Fourth Schedule, the appeal, on the facts stated by the petitioner, should have been filed within one month of the 16th April, 1971. But the petitioner did not send the memorandum of appeal till the 26th September, 1971. The questions that arise, are whether the petitioner is entitled to exclude the period taken in obtaining a certified copy of the award; and when the office of the Appellate Authority remained closed. If the petitioner had the right to claim exclusions of the said period, the petitioner's appeal was within time. If those rights did not exist, the appeal was barred by limitation.
( 4 ) IN our opinion, the appeal was not barred. Sub-section (2) of Section 29 of the Limitation Act lays down inter alia that where any special or local law prescribes for an appeal a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any appeal by any special or local law, the provisions contained in Sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are not expressly excluded by such special or local law.
( 5 ) IT is clear, therefore, that by reason of Sub-section (2) of Section 29 of the Limitation Act of 1963, the period of limitation prescribed by the Co-operative Societies Act, which we have referred to above, shall be deemed to be a period of limitation prescribed by the Limitation Act. And the provisions of Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act would apply to the said period.
( 6 ) NOW Section, 4 of the Limitation Act says inter alia that where the prescribed period for any appeal expires on a day when the Court is closed, the appeal may be preferred on the day when the Court re-opens. In the Explanation to this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.