SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Cal) 260

A.K.SARKAR
BENODE CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
PURNENDU NATH TAGORE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.BANERJI, S.K.BOSE

A. K. SARKAR, J.

( 1 ) AN application for execution of a money decree dated 30th January. 1953 by attachment and sale of the defendant's sixteen annas share in the divided portion of premises No. 30, Maharshi Debendra Road, Calcutta, has been moved before me by the heirs and legal representatives of the plaintiff-decree holder, one Benode Chatterjee since deceased. The application has been made on Tabular Statement affirmed by the said plaintiff-decree-holder on 27th January, 1965. It appears from endorsement in the Tabular Statement that direction was given by the learned master on the same date for issue of notice under Order XXI Rule 22 (1) (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The application was made within 12 years when the default in making the payment directed in the decree in respect of which execution, is sought took place i. e. , 28th February 1953.

( 2 ) THE Notice under Order XXI. Rule 22 (11 (a) was not issued and the plaintiff-decree-holder did not take any step. On April 22. 1965 pending the said execution the plaintiff decree-holder died leaving him surviving Sm. Basanti Chatterjee, widow and Parthe Chatterjee, son as Ms heirs and legal representatives. The said he







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top