S.K.CHAKRAVARTY
B. P. LAHIRI – Appellant
Versus
JYOTIRMAYEE DEVI – Respondent
( 2 ) THE second question that arises is as to whether the learned Munsif was justified in rejecting his application filed under Sections 8 and 9 of Act XXXIV of 1969 (West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Second Amendment) Act, 1969), Section 8 amends Section 21 of the Original Act and Section 9 amends Section 22. Section 13 of Act XXXIV of 1969 would show that the amendments by Sections 8 and 9 "shall have effect in respect of suits including appeals which are pending at the date or commencement of this Act. " Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the suits are still pending, though the defences against the delivery of possession had been struck out and that under the recent amended Sections 21 and 22 referred to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.