SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Cal) 59

RAMENDRA MOHAN DATTA
BISWAPATI DEY – Appellant
Versus
KENNSINGTON STORES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MULLICK

RAMENDRA MOHAN DATTA, J.

( 1 ) THE short but important point involved in this execution application is about the meaning of the expression "when the decree or order be- comes enforceable" as provided in the third column of Article 136 of the Limitation Act of 1963. By the said provision 12 years' time has been given for the execution of a decree. The said Article provids :"136. For the execution of any decree (other than a decree granting a mandatory injunction) or order of any civil Court. Twelve years. When the decree or order becomes enforceable or where the decree or any subsequent order directs any payment of money or the delivery of any property to be made at a certain date or at recurring periods when default in making the payment or delivery in respect of which execution is sought takes place; provided that an application for the enforcement Or execution of a decree granting a perpetual injunction shall not be subject to any period of limitation. "

( 2 ) ON behalf of the decree-holder It is argued that the time to obtain the certified copy of the decree should be excluded in computing the period of 12 years mentioned in column two of the aforesaid Article and 12 years shou














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top