SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Cal) 120

AMARESH ROY, A.K.DAS
SUKUMAR BYSACK – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL KANTA BANERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BANKIM CHANDRA BANERJI, DEBA PRASAD MUKHERJI, ISWARI PRASAD AGRAWAL, LALA HEMANTA KUMAR, PARESH NATH BHATTACHARYA

AMARESH ROY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the Plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of a contract alleged to be a contract for sale of immovable properties. Plaintiff had also prayed in the suit for possession of the disputed properties by evicting the defendant therefrom and other ancilary reliefs. Plaintiffs lost in the original court of Subordinate Judge and also in the appeal. Hence this Second Appeal has been preferred in this Court.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF's case was that defendant was the owner of the disputed properties and he had agreed to sell those to the plaintiff for a consideration of Rs. 8000/ -. On 23-12-1958 an agreement for sale was executed and registered between the parties, the plaintiff having paid Rs. 3. 500/- as earnest money. It was agreed that defendant shall make out a good and marketable title, deliver the title deeds and connected papers within two days from the date of registration of the agreement, clear the mortgage of the property created by him in favour of Government of West Bengal within 21 days from the date of agreement by paying up the dues of the mortgagee out of the earnest money and complete the transaction of sale within 30 days from the da












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top