SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Cal) 248

AJAY KUMAR BASU, B.C.MITRA
MURLIDHAR HASPURIA – Appellant
Versus
BANSIDHAR HALWAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANKAR GHOSH, TEBRIVAL

B. C. MITRA, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent filed the suit out of which this appeal arises, claiming specific performance of a verbal agreement, possession of various articles of the business carried on under the name and style of "murlkihar Apnrwalla," alternatively a decree for Rs. 20,500/- declaration that the sole owner of the business, alternatively decree for dissolution of the partnership business, and for various other reliefs. In this suit a judgment and preliminary decree was passed on February 3, 1971. for dissolur-tion of the partnership, a receiver of the partnership assets was appointed and a decree for a sum of Rs. 1000/- as damages was also passed in favour of the respondent for wrongful trespass by the appellant. This appeal is directed against this judgment and decree.

( 2 ) THE respondent's case was that since prior to December 1, 1961 he and the appellant carried on business of a Flour Mill in co-partnership under the name and style of "murlidhar Agarwalla". In this partnership the respondent had a one third share and the appellant a two third share.

( 3 ) ON or about December 1, 1961 the parties entered into an agreement in writing, which provided that the responde
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top