SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Cal) 256

A.K.SEN
DEBI MATA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arun Kumar Dutta, Nanda Lal Pal, S.C.DAS GUPTA, SUPROKASH BANERJI

ANIL KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) IN these five Rules the petitioners are challenging three notifications and two proclamations issued by the State of West Bengal or its Authorities. As common questions have been raised in ell these Rules they have been heard together and would be disposed of by one judgment.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that facts relevant to the issues raised in these five Writ petitions are same or similar and as such I prefer to set out the facts in Civil Rule 656 (W) of 1964. The petitioner in this Rule Sri Sri Devi Mata is the family Deity of Panchkote Raj Estate. The petitioner had been holding certain lands in intermediary interest in Purulia which was previously within the District of Man-bhum in the State of Bihar. On September 1 1956 the Bihar and West Bengal (Transfer of Territories) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Transfer of Territories Act) came into force. By virtue of Section 3 of this Act major part of Purulia was transferred with effect from 1-11-1956 to West Bengal. Section 43 however provided that notwithstanding such transfer until otherwise provided by a competent legislature or other competent authority the laws then applicable to the trans













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top