SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Cal) 32

P.N.MUKHERJEE, AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
SAILENDRA NATH NEOGY – Appellant
Versus
PURNENDU SEN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BISWAJIT GHOSH, LALA HEMANTA KUMAR, Sachindra Chandra Das Gupta, SANKAR MUKHERJI

( 1 ) THIS Rule arises out of a proceeding for pre-emption under Section 24 of the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949. The opposite parties were the pre-emptors and the petitioner the pre-emptee.

( 2 ) THE learned trial Judge allowed the application for pre-emption subject to payment of compensation, amounting to Rs. 400/-, to the petitioner for the alleged improvements, effected by him in the disputed land since his purchase.

( 3 ) THE lower appellate court dismissed the petitioner's appeal against the aforesaid order of the learned trial Judge, allowing pre-emption in favour of the opposite parties, and upheld the said order for pre-emption. It also allowed the opposite parties' cross-objection against the grant of compensation by the learned trial Judge and dismissed the petitioner's claim in that respect.

( 4 ) THE petitioner then obtained the present Rule, challenging the preemption order in question and disallowance of compensation.

( 5 ) IN support of the Rule, several points were urged by Mr. Lala. The principal point, however, was the question of the vires of Section 24 of the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, which was challenged on the ground that














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top