P.N.MUKHERJEE, AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
SAILENDRA NATH NEOGY – Appellant
Versus
PURNENDU SEN – Respondent
( 2 ) THE learned trial Judge allowed the application for pre-emption subject to payment of compensation, amounting to Rs. 400/-, to the petitioner for the alleged improvements, effected by him in the disputed land since his purchase.
( 3 ) THE lower appellate court dismissed the petitioner's appeal against the aforesaid order of the learned trial Judge, allowing pre-emption in favour of the opposite parties, and upheld the said order for pre-emption. It also allowed the opposite parties' cross-objection against the grant of compensation by the learned trial Judge and dismissed the petitioner's claim in that respect.
( 4 ) THE petitioner then obtained the present Rule, challenging the preemption order in question and disallowance of compensation.
( 5 ) IN support of the Rule, several points were urged by Mr. Lala. The principal point, however, was the question of the vires of Section 24 of the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, which was challenged on the ground that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.