SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Cal) 43

R.N.DUTT, SARMA SARKAR
SUPERINTENDENT AND REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
SATYEN BHOWMIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALAI CHANDRA ROY, J.N.BOSE, JAGADISH KRISHNA BANERJI

R. N. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) AN enquiry under Chapter XVIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure is pending against the opposite parties before a Presidency Magistrate under various sections of the Official Secrets Act, On an application on behalf of the prosecution under Section 14 of the Official Secrets Act the learned Magistrate made an order on April 28, 1969, excluding the public during the trial.

( 2 ) ON November 19, 1969, opposite party No. 12 filed an application before the Magistrate for "copies of deposition of the witnesses" and opposite party No. 16 filed an application for 'copies and for permission to inspect the records and take necessary notes". The learned Magistrate considered these applications and passed an order on November 22, 1969, allowing them under Section 548 of the Code "to take copies of depositions and other documents on payment of proper fees". The State has thereafter obtained this Rule against this order of the learned Magistrate.

( 3 ) MR. Roy appearing on behalf of the State first contends that the commitment enquiry has just started and only a few witnesses have been examined or, in other words, no trial has yet commenced and no "judgment" has as yet b












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top