SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Cal) 151

P.B.MUKHARJI, T.K.BASU
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
TEXTILE MACHINERY CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARIJIT CHAUDHARY, B.L.PAL, D.PAL, LEILA SETH

P. B. MUKHARJI, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS income-tax reference under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, refers the three following questions for determination by the court. The questions are :" (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the steel foundry division was an industrial undertaking to which Section 15c of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, applied? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the jute mill division set up by the assessee-company was an industrial undertaking to which Section 15c of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, applied? (3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the claim for deduction of wealth-tax paid during the accounting year was admissible in computing the assessee's profits from its business ?"

( 2 ) WE can straightaway dispose of the third question as we find it is already covered by the decision in Travancore Titanium Products Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, where the Supreme Court held that the amount of wealth-tax paid by an assessee on his net wealth under
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top