SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Cal) 63

P.K.BANERJI
MUST. HASNEAR KHATUN – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE OFFICER, MIDNAPORE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BASANTA KUMAR PANDA, GOPAL CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY

P. K. BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) IN this Rule the petitioner challenges the orders passed under Section 44 (2a) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 and the notice issued under Section 57 read with Section 44 (2a) of the W. B. Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner is the owner of 18. 58 acres of agricultural lands in several mouzas within the Police Station Keshpur, District Midnapore. It is stated in the petition that apart from the said 18. 58 acres of lands, she has no other lands. It is stated that total lands of the petitioner were within the ceiling limits and were retainable under Section 6 (1) of the W. B. Estates Acquisition Act She did not file any B Form for retention of the said land and it is stated that she is not required to file any return in Form 'b' in view of Rule 4 (A) of the W. B. Estates Acquisition Rule. The properties described in Schedule A and other properties were bequeathed by the husband of the petitioner by Hibabul-Awaz which was executed and registered on 11th August, 1956. It is stated that the petitioner's name was recorded in the record of rights prepared under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act and t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top