SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Cal) 250

S.C.GHOSH
SOUMENDRA KUMAR DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
SRIDHAR JEW – Respondent


S. C. GHOSE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by plaintiff for an injunction restraining the defendant No. 9 from constructing or continuing the construction on the eastern portion and courtyard of the premises No. 89, Burtolla street, in Calcutta within the said jurisdiction. According to the plaintiff, the plaintiff is the owner of an undivided l/4th share of the said premises. The defendant No. 10 is also the owner of an undivided 1/4th share and the defendant No. 1 is the owner of an undivided 1/2 share of the said premises. The defendants Nos. 2 to 8 are shebaits and/or trustees to the said estate of the defendant No. 1.

( 2 ) THE defendant No. 9 is the lessee under an instrument of lease of the eastern portion of the said property for a period of 50 years with the option to extend the same for a further period of 25 years. The defendant No. 9, according to the plaintiff has been causing constructions to be made on the eastern portion of the said property to the detriment and prejudice of other co-owners including the plaintiff.

( 3 ) IT must be noted that the only other co-owner apart from the plaintiff even if the property be joint as alleged is the defendant No. 10. The d












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top