SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Cal) 244

AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
LAKSHMI BALA CHANAK – Appellant
Versus
BROJENDRA NATH PAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Debabrata Nandi, PANCHANAN PAL, Rebati Nath Sarkar

AMIYA KUMAR MOOKERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule was obtained by the plaintiff and it is directed against an order of the learned Munsif dismissing the petitioner's application under Section 151, Civil Procedure Code, praying for extending the time to make the deposit in terms of a decree for specific performance of a contract under certain circumstances.

( 2 ) THE facts that lie in a short compass may be stated as follows:--

( 3 ) ON March 2, 1028 by a registered Kobala, the petitioner purchased from her mother with her "stridhan". 28 decimal of land in Dag No. 801, appertaining to Khatian No. 422 of Mouza Benai within the Midnapore Collectorate, in the name of her husband. On or about 1st December, 1959, the petitioner took a loan of Rs. 800/- from the opposite party No. 1, on executing a sale deed in respect of the above land in favour of the said opposite party No. 1, who executed an agreement of reconveyance of the said property in favour of the petitioner, on condition, that the said sum of Rs. 800/- was to be paid back to the said opposite party No. 1 within 1370 B. S. It is the case of the petitioner, that, she tendered the money within the stipulated time with a request to execu







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top