SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 96

P.CHATTERJEE
24 PARAGANAS ZILLA PARISHAD – Appellant
Versus
MERCANTILE ENGINEERING CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahendra Nath Mitra, R.N.Mitra, Ranen Mitra

P. CHATTERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed by the court of appeal below in a suit for money where no appeal lies.

( 2 ) THE defendant is the appellant. The plaintiff repaired certain boilers and tendered a bill on 5th July 1957. On 7th August 1958 notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure was served. On 10th June 1961 the suit was filed.

( 3 ) THE first point is that no notice under Section 146 of the Bengal Local Self-Government Act was served and so the suit is not maintainable. But Section 146 refers to a suit which relates to "any act done by a person under the authority of the Bengal Local Self-Government Act. " But if a District Engineer sends his road roller for repair that is not something which is done under this Act. In the ordinary course of his duty he sends it for repairs and not because the authority under the Local Self-Government Act directs him to send the same for repair, There is no provision in the Act itself as far as I am aware which authorises the district engineer to send it for repair. We cannot say that this act of sending the road roller for repair was





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top