SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 299

P.N.MUKHERJEE, AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
KRISHNA SARDAR – Appellant
Versus
SINDHU BALA DASI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.CHAKRABORTY THAKUR, GAGANENDRA KRISHNA DEB, Jitendra Nath Guha, Jnan Ranjan Ganguly

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent appeal against the judgment of our learned brother, Bijayesh Mukharji, J. The appellant before us was the contesting defendant in the suit, which was brought by the plaintiff-respondent for declaration of title and recovery of joint possession along with pro forma defendant No. 3.

( 2 ) THE suit was dismissed by the two Courts below, but, in second appeal, this Court decreed the plaintiff's suit.

( 3 ) THE whole controversy between the parties rests on the effect of a Memorandum on the rights of the parties under Section 53a of the Transfer of Property Act. That Memorandum, as we read the same, records the fact of taking of possession by the parties concerned in pursuance of an exchange or agreement of exchange, made by mem in respect of their respective properties in Pakistan and India. It is the defendant's case that, in view of the said Memorandum, he is entitled to have his possession protected under Section 53a of the Transfer of Property Act. The Memorandum has been set out in the judgment of our learned brother on a translation from the original, which is in Bengali. The translation appears to be a proper translation and,


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top