P.N.MUKHERJEE, AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
KRISHNA SARDAR – Appellant
Versus
SINDHU BALA DASI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent appeal against the judgment of our learned brother, Bijayesh Mukharji, J. The appellant before us was the contesting defendant in the suit, which was brought by the plaintiff-respondent for declaration of title and recovery of joint possession along with pro forma defendant No. 3.
( 2 ) THE suit was dismissed by the two Courts below, but, in second appeal, this Court decreed the plaintiff's suit.
( 3 ) THE whole controversy between the parties rests on the effect of a Memorandum on the rights of the parties under Section 53a of the Transfer of Property Act. That Memorandum, as we read the same, records the fact of taking of possession by the parties concerned in pursuance of an exchange or agreement of exchange, made by mem in respect of their respective properties in Pakistan and India. It is the defendant's case that, in view of the said Memorandum, he is entitled to have his possession protected under Section 53a of the Transfer of Property Act. The Memorandum has been set out in the judgment of our learned brother on a translation from the original, which is in Bengali. The translation appears to be a proper translation and,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.