SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 284

CHANDRA NARAYAN LAIK, ANIL KUMAR SINHA
MADAN LAL LOHIA – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, "A" WARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.CHOUDHARY, Manas Nath Roy, S.K.BOSE, SUDHINDRA KUMAR KAR

A. K. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) IN this rule the petitioner prays for cancellation of an order imposing penalty of Rs. 3,000 in the first instance for nonpayment of Rs. 35,000 as estate duty by the Assistant Controller on 25th March, 1964, under the Estate Duty Act. Shortly put, the facts are as follows : the petitioner is a lessee in respect of premises No. 13, Indian Exchange Place, Calcutta, which belonged to one Rai Bhupati Nath Deb Bahadur who died on September 23, 1959. After his death, proceedings were taken under the Estate Duty Act by the Assistant Controller and an assessment was made to the extent of Rs. 1,40,090. 20. For realisation of this amount, a notice purporting to be one under Section 73 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, read with Section 46 (5a) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, dated January 9, 1962, was given by the respondent No. 1. In the said notice it was stated that a sum of Rs. 1,40,090. 20 was due from one Tulsi Charan Deb and others on account of estate duty as "accountable person" to the estate of the said Bhupati Nath Deb Bahadur, since deceased.

( 2 ) IT is stated that after this notice the petitioner made two payments of Rs. 1,400 each, the said amounts being rents







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top