SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 44

D.N.SINHA, B.C.MITRA
SOHANLAL RUIA – Appellant
Versus
KEDARNATH PURUSHOTTAMDAS AND CO. PRIVATE LTD. – Respondent


B. C. MITRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against an order dated June 7, 1966 whereby the appellants' application for recalling and/or setting aside a decree dated April 7, 1966, was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE suit in which the decree wag passed, was called on for hearing on March 25, 1966. The witness of the respondent No. 1 (plaintiff in the suit) Murlidhar Jhunnjhunwalla was examined and his cross-examination was concluded on March 31, 1966. On the same day Ishwari Prasad Ruia the appellant No. 2 was examined as a witness on behalf of the defendant but his cross-examination was not concluded on that day. The suit was thereafter not called on for hearing until April 7, 1966. On that day the examination of the appellant No. 2 was concluded. The next witness on behalf of the appellants was one Debi Prosad Bajoria, but this witness was not present in Court when the cross-examination of the appellant No. 2 was concluded. According to the appellants Debi Prosad had informed them in the morning of the same day that it was absolutely necessary for him to go to his factory at No. 1 Ultadanga Main Road, but ho also promised to attend the Court at 11 a. m. The appellants relied on this ass

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top