SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 11

D.BASU
SERAJUDDIN AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, SEALDAH CHARGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Basu, BALIN BASU, D.PAL, DEBESH MUKHERJI, HANS KUMARI DEB BURMAN, N.C.CHAKRAVARTI, P.K.Sen, S.RAY

D. BASU, J.

( 1 ) BY the assessment order at annexure N to the petition, respondent 1 has disallowed the claim of the petitioner for deduction from its gross turnover for taxation under the Bengal (Finance) Sales Tax Act, 1941 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), on the ground that the three items at page 95 of the petition do not constitute sales in the course of export within the meaning of Article 286 (1) (b) of the Constitution, as contended by the petitioner. Though the petition comprised relief against all the three items amounting to Rs. 26,23,067. 15, at the hearing, Dr. Debi Pal on behalf of the petitioner has confined his case to two items only, namely, item 1 amounting to Rs. 9,47,940. 62 and item 3 relating to Rs. 12,04,097. 20.

( 2 ) THE question of law involved in this case has been fully examined, with reference to all authorities then available, in the Division Bench case of S. K. Roy v. Board of Revenue A. I. R. 1967 Cal. 338, to which I was a party. The two propositions formulated therein may be reiterated : (a) Where a local or internal sale is made "for the purpose of export" or as "preparatory to export", it cannot come within the exemption under Article 2










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top