SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 150

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.PAL, N.L.PAL, R.Murarka

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 66 (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, The Tribunal has sent to this court a statement of the case on the following question :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the property tax paid by the assessee in Japan on its vessels was allowable as deduction under Section 10 (2) (xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 ?"

( 2 ) THE assessment years are 1956-57, 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60. The corresponding previous years were the financial years ending on the 31st of March, 1956, 1957, 1958 and 1959, respectively. The respondent is a nonresident shipping company. Its registered office is in Japan. It has been assessed to income-tax for the assessment years aforesaid under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, with respect to net Indian earnings. The assessee did not maintain separate accounts for its Indian business ; its net profits on the basis of its world profit and loss account was computed under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and, thereafter under Rule 33 of the Rules, the Indian net profit was worked out in the proportion as between the gross Indian earnings and the gross world earnings. In the matt












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top