SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 74

R.N.DUTT, B.BANERJI
MAHADEB KARMAKAR – Appellant
Versus
ADHIR KUMAR KARMAKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BISWA RANJAN GHOSAL, KALIPADA TRIVEDI, RAMENDRA NATH CHAKRAVORTI

R. N. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) : On an application by the petitioner before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Barrackpore, a proceeding under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was started against the opposite parties and a conditional order was issued and they were asked to show cause. They appeared and showed cause before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. Thereafter the Sub-Divisional Magistrate transferred the case to Shri M. N. Pramanick, Magistrate 1st Class, for disposal. Shri Pramanick examined witnesses, heard arguments but ultimately held that the transfer of the proceeding to him was incompetent and as such he dropped the proceeding. The petitioner has obtained this Rule against this order of the said Magistrate, Shri M. N. Pramanick.

( 2 ) WHEN the opposite parties were directed to show cause, there was no specific direction as to whether cause should be shown before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate or any other Magistrate. We find that though the order does not specifically say that cause was to be shown to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the cause was in fact shown before him because there was no direction that cause was to be shown before some other Magistrate. We then find



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top