SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 263

AMARESH ROY, S.N.BAGCHI
KALYANI SEN – Appellant
Versus
SK. ENAYETULLAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.BOSE, AMARENDRA MOHAN MITRA, JANHABI CHARAN DAS, JAYGOPAL GHOSH, PADMA B.CHATERJI

ROY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise from the same suit and the decree passed therein. They have been heard together.

( 2 ) FIRST Appeal No. 123 of 1957 is directed against the decree for khas possession of the suit premises on eviction of the defendants therefrom passed by the Second Court of the Additional Judge at Alipore in Title Suit No. 32 of 1956. This appeal has been preferred by Defendant No. 3 joining the plaintiffs as respondents and also joining the other two defendants as respondents. It may be mentioned here that the appellant Smt. Kalyani Sen, who was joined in the trial Court as the Defendant no. 3 during the pendency of the suit, is no other than the wife of D. C. Sen who was the Defendant No. 2 in the trial Court and is the Respondent No. 12 in this Court.

( 3 ) THE suit was originally filed by 10 plaintiffs who were the owners of the premises No. 51, N. Gorcha Road against two persons of whom the first defendant, P. S. Paul was the tenant who took settlement of the suit premises as a monthly tenant under the plaintiffs, and the other defendant was a person who according to the plaintiff has been given possession of the suit premises by the said tenant Sri P.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top