SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 243

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
P. B. MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI MUKHERJI
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX (CENTRAL) - Appellant
Versus
MOHAN LAL NOPANY - Respondent
Matter 360  Of  1966
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 19, 1969

Advocates Appeared:
AJOY MITRA, B.L.PAL, LEILA SETH

In determining the market value of assets under Section 7 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the Wealth-tax Officer should consider all relevant economic factors and is not confined to the balance-sheet value or the written down value in income-tax proceedings.

Headnote:

WEALTH TAX - Valuation of assets - Break-up method - Depreciation - Dividends proposed but not declared - Agricultural income-tax paid.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, an individual, held shares in two companies, Hind Mills Ltd. and Shree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd., which were not quoted in the stock exchange. The assessee contended that in computing the break-up value of the shares, the depreciable assets of the companies should be taken at their written down values as per income-tax records, that the dividends proposed but not declared by the companies should be deducted from the gross value of the assets, and that the agricultural income-tax paid by Shree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. should be deducted from the gross value of the assets.

Finding of the Court:

1. The Tribunal was justified in holding that the valuation of the depreciable assets of the companies should be based on their income-tax written down values in place of their balance-sheet values, as there was evidence that the balance-sheets did not correctly represent the value of those assets and that the written down values represented the correct position. 2. The Tribunal was not justified in holding that the liabilities of the companies for the dividends proposed but not declared as at the valuation date should also be deducted from the gross value of the assets of the companies, as there was no evidence that the dividends were not declared due to paucity of funds. 3. The Tribunal was not justified in holding that the agricultural income-tax paid by Shree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. was liable to be deducted from the gross value of the assets, as there was no existing liability for the payment of this sum on the relevant valuation date and the company had shown the sum as one of its assets.

Issues: 1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the valuation of the depreciable assets of the companies should be based on their income-tax written down values in place of their balance-sheet values? 2. Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the liabilities of the companies for the dividends proposed but not declared as at the valuation date should also be deducted from the gross value of the assets of the companies? 3. Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the agricultural income-tax paid by Shree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. was liable to be deducted from the gross value of the assets?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The balance-sheets did not correctly represent the value of the depreciable assets, as there was evidence that depreciation had not been provided for due to paucity of funds. 2. There was no evidence that the dividends were not declared due to paucity of funds. 3. There was no existing liability for the payment of the agricultural income-tax on the relevant valuation date and the company had shown the sum as one of its assets.

Final Decision: Question 1 is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee. Question 2 is answered in the negative and in favour of the revenue. Question 3 is answered in the negative and against the assessee.

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference arises out of the assessment made under the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment year 1959-60, for which the corresponding valuation date was 31st March, 1959. The assessee is an individual holding certain shares in Messrs. Hind Mills Ltd. and Shree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. These shares are not quoted in the stock exchange. Before the Wealth-tax Officer it was not disputed that the break-up value of the shares of these companies computed on the basis of the balance-sheets should be taken as the market values thereof. The assessee, however, contended before the Wealth-tax Officer that in computing the break-up value, of the shares of Messrs. Hind Mills Ltd. and Sri Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. , the depreciable assets of the two companies should be taken at their written down values as per income-tax records. The Tribunal was of the opinion that no depreciation had been shown in the balance-sheets and, therefore, it would be unrealistic to take the book value of the assets. The Tribunal came to the conclusion that the prospective buyers of the shares would take into consideration the fact that the assets of the companies concerned had depreciated year after year due to use, although no depreciation had been shown in the balance-sheets. The Tribunal, therefore, directed that the written down values of such depreciable assets should be taken instead of the values shown in the respective balance-sheets.

( 2 ) ANOTHER contention was put forward by the assessee that the dividends proposed but not declared by Messrs. Hind Agents Private Ltd. and Shri Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. , as on the relevant valuation date should be deducted from the gross value of the assets of the companies. The Tribunal was of the opinion that they should be so deducted and directed the Wealth-tax Officer to recompute the break-up value of the shares after allowing the dividends proposed by the companies but not declared on or before the relevant valuation date.

( 3 ) THE third contention of the assessee before the Tribunal was that in computing the break-up value of the shares of Sri Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. , a further deduction should be allowed from the gross value of the assets in respect of the agricultural income-tax, amounting to Rs. 1,63,385, which had been paid under protest to the Bihar Government on account of the agricultural income-tax assessment as shown in the balance-sheet. The Tribunal was of the opinion that this sum of Rs. 1,63,385 was certainly a factor liable to be taken into account by the prospective buyers of the shares while estimating the market value. The Tribunal, therefore, directed that Rs. 1,63,385 be left out of the assets while computing the break-up "value of the shares of the company.

( 4 ) THE Tribunal has referred under Section 27 (1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the following questions to this court:"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in determining the break-up value of the shares held by the assessee in Messrs. Hind Mills Ltd. and Messrs. Shree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. , the Income-tax Tribunal was justified in holding that the valuation of the depreciable assets of the companies concerned should be based on their income-tax written down values in place of their balance-sheet values ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in determining the break up value of the shares held by the assessee in Messrs. Hind Agents (P.) Ltd. and Messrs. Shree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. , the Income-tax Tribunal was justified in holding that the liabilities of the companies concerned for the dividends proposed but not declared as at the valuation date should also be deducted from the gross value of the assets of the companies? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that in determining the break-up value of the shares in Sree Hanuman Sugar Mills Ltd. Agricultural income-tax paid lay the said c


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top