B.N.BANERJEE, K.L.RAY
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL-1 – Appellant
Versus
SANDERSONS AND MORGANS – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS reference, under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 raises an interesting question about solicitor-client relationship.
( 2 ) THE institution of Solicitors is an English institution, which has been imported to or copied by this country. In dealing with the position of Solicitors in India, Marten, C. J. , observed in Tyabji Dayabhai and Co. v. Jetha Devsi and Co. , AIR 1927 Bom 542:--"in the first place it must be clearly understood that the rights and duties of attorney are in no way part of the indigenous law or practice in India. Their profession originates from, England; it grew up under the English Common Law and it is clear that it was the Common Law which governed their rights and duties in the King's Courts established by the Supreme Court Charter of 1823 to which Courts our present High Court is the successor. "this Court quoted with approval the above observation in Damodar Das v. Morgan and Co. , AIR 1934 Cal 341 and Panckridge, J. , observed:"mutatis mutandis those words appear to me to apply to the Calcutta High Court. I take the learned Chief Justice's words as amounting to a statement that the rights of an attorney in India are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.