SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 71

BANERJEE, K.L.RAY
ABDUL GANI HAJI HABIB – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, DIPAK SEN, J.B.PAL, P.K.Mazumder, T.K.BASU

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference, under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has been made in circumstances hereinafter related.

( 2 ) HAJI Habib Haji Pirmohammed, now deceased, represented by his legal representatives, Abdul Gani Haji Habib and others, used to be assessed as an individual. It was stated before us that the said assessee was a Pakistani national and by two notifications published in the India Gazette, dated December 11, 1965, the estate of the deceased assessee vested in the Custodian of Enemy Property for India. The first of the notifications reads :"no: 12/137/65-E. Pty.--In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-rule (1) of Rule 133-V of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, the Central Government is pleased to order that all property in India, movable and immovable, belonging to, or held byj or managed on behalf of, Messrs. Haji Habib Pirmohammed, 25, Amratolla Street, Calcutta-1, shall vest in the Custodian of Enemy Property for India. "

( 3 ) THE other notification is couched in the following language :"no. 12/39/65-E. Pty.--In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-rule (1) of Rule 133-V of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, the Central Governme



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top