SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 191

A.N.RAY, SISIR KUMAR MUKHERJEE
BRAHMAPUTRA TEA CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
TURNER MORRISON AND CO. LTD – Respondent


RAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is from the order of Mukherjee, J. dated 24 July, 1968.

( 2 ) THE order was passed on the notice of motion taken out by Brahmaputra Tea Co. Ltd. , inter alia, for an order that Brahmaputra Tea Co. Ltd. be added as a party.

( 3 ) THE learned Judge was pleased to hold that the Brahmaputra Tea Co. Ltd. was neither a necessary nor a proper party and therefore was not entitled to be added as a party to the suit.

( 4 ) THE suit to which Brahmaputra Tea Co. Ltd. applied to be added as a party was instituted in the month of November, 1965. The plaintiff Turner Morrison and Co. Ltd. filed this suit against Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. The plaintiff in the suit claimed a decree for Rs. 1,27,67,052. 16 and a declaration that the plaintiff has a first and paramount lien and charge on 2,295 shares in the plaintiff company held by the defendant and on all dividends payable to the defendant in respect thereof, for the aforesaid sum and for possession of the said shares and a decree directing the sale of the shares and appropriation of the proceeds of sale in protanto satisfaction of the claim of the plaintiff. Broadly stated the plaintiff's claim is that the plai












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top