SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 23

A.K.DAS
NANDALAL MITRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIRENDRA NATH BANERJEE, Sisir Kumar Bose

A. K. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is against an order passed by a learned Magistrate, Chandernagore, convicting the petitioner under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 50 in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days.

( 2 ) WHAT happened is as follows: The complainant was a tenant in respect of a house under the accused person. Supply of water in the tenant's portion was stopped and the tenant filed an application before the Rent Controller for restoration of the water supply. A notice was served on the landlord for restoration of water supply but this order was violated. Thereafter the learned Magistrate prosecuted the landlord under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code for violation of the order and convicted him.

( 3 ) THE learned Advocate for the petitioner has challenged the applicability of Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code for violation of the order of the Rent Control-ler under the provisions of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. Section 31 of the Act empowers the Rent Controller to impose penalty for disturbance of assessment etc. Section 34 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act empowers the Co


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top