SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 162

P.B.MUKHARJI
TURNER MORRISON AND CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
HUNGERFORD INVESTMENT TRUST LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.N.BANERJI, MUKHERJEE, SEN

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application on behalf of Brahmaputra Tea Co. Ltd. to be added as a party defendant in this suit and for stay of the suit until the disposal of this application. The application is dated 17-7-68. The grounds of this application are the petition of Brahmaputra Tea Co. Ltd. , the applicant, verified by an affidavit of Bejoy Kumar Mundra, a Director of the applicant Company affirmed on 17-7-68 and also the plaint and proceedings in the present suit.

( 2 ) THE substance of this application is the submission that the petitioner Brahmaputra Tea Co. Ltd. is a necessary party to the suit. In order to show that it is a necessary party to the suit, the applicant relies on mainly two agreements, one dated 16-1-68 and the other dated 27-1-68.

( 3 ) THE first agreement of 16-1-68 is between Nirmaljit Singh Hoon and Sukhdev Varma. By this agreement Mr. Hoon agrees to sell and Mr. Varma agrees to buy Mr. Hoon's entire interest in the companies mentioned in the agreement for the sum of 225,000 payable on (a) 15-2-68, (b) 31-12-68, (c) 31-12-69 and (d) 31-12-70, the first of such payment being 75,000 and the rest of the instalments at the rate of 50,000. There





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top