SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 125

N.C.TALUKDAR
MAHAMAYA DASI – Appellant
Versus
SANAT KUMAR LAW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANANGA KUMAR DHAR, D.N.GHOSH, HARASIT GHOSH

N. C. TALUKDAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule must be made absolute,

( 2 ) THE Rule is directed against an order dated the 19th April, 1968 passed by Shri K. J. Sen Gupta, Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, directing the delivery of a motor vehicle to the accused-opposite parties on a joint bond of Rupees 20. 000 on condition that they would not be allowed to take the car and use it outside the jurisdiction of Calcutta without previous permission of the court.

( 3 ) THE facts leading on to the present Rule can be set out in a short compass. The case brings to light an unfortunate tussle between the mother and two of her sons and the subject-matter of the dispute is an Ambassador Mark II Car. No. WBG 2448. The parties come of a respectable family of Calcutta The complainant-petitioner, who is the mother is the widow of late Tulshi Charan Law and the two opposite parties are her sons. The late Tulshi Charan Law died leaving 6 sons and 4 daughters. Four of the sons live with the mother as also the youngest sister at 385/1, Keyatala Lane, Calcutta while two other sons who are the opposite parties in the present Rule live separate from the petitioner and others, at 10, Pretoria Street, Calcu







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top