SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 131

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, K. L. RAY
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - Appellant
Versus
CHOWRINGHEE SALES BUREAU PRIVATE LTD. - Respondent
Income-Tax Reference 77  Of  1966
Decided On : JUNE 18, 1968

Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, N.L.PAL, NANI COOMAR CHAKRABORTY, Nirmal Mukherjee

Sales tax charged by an auctioneer is part of its trading receipts and is liable to be assessed to income-tax.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX - Sales tax charged by auctioneer - Whether forms part of trading receipts and liable to income-tax - Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, Sections 2 (c), 2 (h), Explanation 2.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a private limited company dealing in furniture and acting as auctioneers, collected Rs. 32,986 as sales tax from purchasers in auctions held by it. The Income-tax Officer included this amount in the assessee's total income, holding that it was part of the sale price and not a liability. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner deleted the amount, finding that the assessee had credited it to a sales tax collection account and had not treated it as its liability.

Finding of the Court:

The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision, holding that the sales tax was a liability and not income, as it was collected by the assessee for the purpose of making it over to the State in due time. It further observed that if the High Court finally decided that the assessee was liable to pay the sales tax to the State, the amount would have to be made over to the Government. If, on the other hand, the High Court upheld the decision of the writ court and held that the assessee was not liable for any sales tax, the amount would have to be refunded to the purchasers.

Issues: Whether the sales tax charged by an auctioneer forms part of his trading receipts and is as such liable to be assessed to income-tax.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the sales tax charged by the assessee was an integral part of the commercial transaction of sales by auction carried on by the assessee and when they were received they were the moneys of the assessee and remained thereafter the moneys of the assessee as its trading receipts. The Income-tax Officer was justified in bringing to tax the amount of Rs. 32,986.

Final Decision: The court answered the question referred to it in the negative and against the assessee. The assessee was directed to pay the costs of the reference.

ROY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and the point for our consideration is whether sales tax charged by an auctioneer forms part of his trading receipts and is as such liable to be assessed to income-tax.

( 2 ) THE assessee is a private limited company, dealing in furniture and also acting as auctioneers. For the assessment year 1960-61, for which the corresponding accounting year was the financial year ending 31st March, 1960, the Income-tax Officer found that the assessee had collected a sum of Rs. 32,986 from the purchasers in the auctions held by it over and above the amount of Rs. 50,187 which it had earned as commission. He found that the aseessee had made out one cash memo. in respect of each sale, including therein the price of the articles and also the amount of sales tax payable thereon. In his opinion that amount of Rs. 32,986 was in reality a portion of the sale price itself, because sales tax was not legally due from the purchasers of the goods but was the liability of the sellers only. As the amounts realised as sales tax had not been paid to the owners of the goods, the amounts formed part of the income of the assessee along with the amount of the commission and accordingly he also included the sum of Rs. 32,986 in the assessee's total income.

( 3 ) ON appeal by the assessee, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner noticed that in the cash memo. issued by the assessee to the purchasers in the auctions, the assessee was shown as the seller. According to him, as between the purchasers and the assessee, the assessee was the full owner of the goods and so long as the assessee's customers did not revoke the contract, the assessee continued to be the seller of the goods. Further, under the provisions of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, the assessee was a dealer and was liable for sales tax. While the receipts of the amounts described as sales tax were receipts in the course of the assessee's business, yet, as the assessee had credited these amounts to the sales tax collection account and had not treated them as its liabilities, the amounts could not be held to be the assessee's income. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner noticed that on the assessee's petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court of Calcutta, by its decision dated 16th November, 1960, had held that the assessee was not a dealer under the aforesaid Sales Tax Act and as such there was no liability on the assessee to pay sales tax. But as this decision was subject to appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was of the opinion that the assessee was justified in treating these amounts as liabilities and not as income. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner accordingly deleted the amount of Rs. 32,986 from the assessment.

( 4 ) THE department appealed against the said order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the assessee has been following this practice since the year 1946 and the total balance standing to the credit of the sales tax account stood at Rs. 2,71,698 at the time of the hearing of the appeal, which had neither been paid to the State Government nor had been refunded to the persons from whom it had been collected. The Tribunal found as a fact that the assessee had collected sales tax in the course of its business as auctioneers. It has further found that the assessee had contested the claim of the Sales Tax Authorities for sales tax on the ground that it was not a dealer within the meaning of the Explanation 2 to Section 2 (c) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act and that the assessee's contention was accepted by the High Court in its judgment in Chowringhee Sales Bureau Ltd. v. State of West Bengal [1961] 12 S. T. C. 535. The Sales Tax Authorities have preferred an appeal against the aforesaid decision and the appeal is pending for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court. The Tribunal rejected the department's contention th














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top