P.N.MUKHERJEE, A.K.DUTTA
PIRISKA ROZARIO – Appellant
Versus
FORD FOUNDATION – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Rule raises some important questions. It arises out of a proceeding under the Motor Vehicles Act.
( 2 ) THE points for consideration are whether the tribunal under the Act, hearing claim petitions, has power to order substitution of the legal heirs and representatives of a deceased claimant and. If so, under what circumstances and with what effect.
( 3 ) THE Instant proceeding was started as a claim, proceeding by one Augustine Paul Rozario, who filed this claim case for compensation on account of Injuries, sustained by him in a motor accident, which took place on March 2, 1965, in Ballygunge Circular Road. During the pendency of the said claim case, the above claimant died on October 5. 1965. This fact was brought to the notice of the tribunal below on November 2, 1965, by the learned Advocate for the deceased claimant and he prayed for time to file a petition for substitution of the heirs and legal representatives of the said deceased. That petition was originally rejected by the tribunal below by its order No. 3, dated November 2, 1965, on the ground that on the death of Rozario his cause-of-action did not survive and so no question of substitution of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.