SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 173

K.L.RAY, BANERJEE
RADHA DEVI SARAOGI – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.GUPTA, D.PAL

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference, under Section 64 (1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, has been made in the circumstances hereinafter stated.

( 2 ) ONE Ramjiwan Saraogi died on July 13, 1955. He was, at all material times, the karta of Hindu undivided family consisting of himself, his wife and two minor sons. The share of the deceased, in the undivided family, was, as such, only one-fourth. During the lifetime of the deceased, he effected a number of insurances on his own life. All the policies were, it is said, assigned by the deceased in favour of his wife. The total amount receivable under the said policies was Rs. 2,01,036.

( 3 ) IN computing the principal value of the estate, for the purpose of assessment of estate duty, the question arose whether the insurance money, amounting to Rs. 2,01,036, should be treated as the absolute property of the deceased or the property of the Hindu undivided family, of which the deceased was the karta. The widow of the deceased, Sm. Radha Debi Saraogi, who is the accountable person, contended that the said sum of Rs. 2,01,036 should be treated as the property of the Hindu undivided family and the one-fourth share of the deceased therein shoul






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top