SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 197

B.N.BANERJEE, K.L.RAY
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, W. BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
CHAMPA KUMARI SINGHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.PAL, M.SEAL

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference, under Section 27 (1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, has been made in the circumstances hereinafter related.

( 2 ) FOR the assessment year 1957-1958 (the relevant valuation date being December 31, 1956) the Wealth-tax Officer assessed the assessee Sm. Champa Kumari Singhi, in respect of family assets, in the status of a Hindu Undivided Family. Against the order of assessment, the assessee appealed before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and, inter alia, contended. (1) that regard being had to the description of the assesses in the notice of demand, as Champa Kumari Singhi and ors. , the assessee should be deemed to nave been treated as an association of persons and that such a unit was not chargeable to tax under the Wealth-tax Act. (2) that the assessee being a member of a Jain family could not be treated as a Hindu Undivided Family. (3) that even if the assessee be treated as a Hindu Undivided Family the imposition of Wealth-tax on a Hindu Undivided Family was ultra vires the Constitution.

( 3 ) THE Appellate Assistant Commissioner negatived all the three contentions with the following observation :--"as regards the objection regarding the d




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top