SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 35

A.K.MUKHERJI, D.N.SINHA
KABIRAJ SRINARAYAN SARMA – Appellant
Versus
BAIJNATH BHARTIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Kumar Sen, Gopinath Nandi, LALA HEMANTA KUMAR, MANICK CHANDRA BANERJEE, RANJIT KUMAR.BANERJI

ARUN K. MUKHERJEA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against a judgment and order dated 30th April, 1960, of the 5th Bench of the City Civil Court by which a decree of ejectment was passed against the defendant.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are as follows: The defendant was a tenant under the plaintiff in respect of one shop room on the ground floor of premises No. 244, Chittaranjan Avenue, Calcutta. The tenancy was according to the English calendar month. By an order the 10th August, 1957 the Third Judge of the Presidency Small Causes Court at Calcutta fixed the standard rent of the premises in suit at Rs. 39/9/-per month from July, 1949 upto March, 1952 and at Rs. 39/11/- (i. e. Rs. 39. 69 np) with effect from the ,1st April 1952. According to the plaintiff, the defendant continued to pay rent for the months of July, August, September and October, 1957 at the rate of Rs. 38. 50 np. though before the dates of deposits of these rents the rent had been standardised at a higher rate. It was only on the 21st December, 1957 that the defendant paid Rs. 67. 25 np which, according to the defendant, included rent at the rate of Rs. 39. 69 np. for the month of November, 1957 as well as an e








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top