A.N.RAY
RAGHUNATH PRASAD JHUNJHUNWALA – Appellant
Versus
HIND OVERSEAS (PRIVATE) LIMITED – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioners, Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwala and Phoolchand Jhunjhunwala made an application for winding up of Hind Overseas (Private) Limited. The other applications in regard to this Company are an application for stay of winding up and an application for the appointment of Provisional Liquidator and an application for injunction. All the four applications were heard from time to time because of the inconvenience of Counsel to have the hearing concluded. The final hearing was concluded in the month of March 1967. In the meantime an application for contempt was made. Because of that application the judgment could not be delivered inasmuch as if it appeared that a party was guilty of contempt he should have to purge himself of the contempt first. The application for contempt was heard in the last week of May, 1967. For all these reasons the judgment could not be delivered earlier.
( 2 ) I must at the outset state that Counsel for the petitioner argued with industry in this matter and was of great assistance to the Court. Counsel for the respondents also gave considerable assistance to the Court. The reason why I refer to this assistance is because some of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.