SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 137

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
BANERJEE, K. L. RAY
INDIAN STEEL AND WIRE PRODUCTS LTD. - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - Respondent
Income-Tax Reference 53  Of  1963
Decided On : JULY 3, 1967

Advocates Appeared:
B.GUPTA, K.N.MUKHERJI, S.K.BANERJEE, S.MUKHERJEE, S.R.Banerjee

An expenditure incurred not with a view to the direct and immediate benefit for purposes of commercial expediency and in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business is, therefore, expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX - DEDUCTION - CONTRIBUTION TO POLITICAL PARTY - WHETHER ALLOWABLE AS EXPENDITURE WHOLLY AND EXCLUSIVELY LAID OUT FOR THE BUSINESS - COMPANIES ACT, 1956, S. 17(1)(A) - INDIAN INCOME-TAX ACT, 1922, S. 10(2)(XV).

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a public limited company, claimed deduction of Rs. 1,50,000, contributed to the Indian National Congress, as an allowable deduction under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Income-tax Officer allowed the deduction, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disallowed it on the ground that the payment was not made out of sheer commercial expediency so as to be of some assistance to the day-to-day carrying out of the assessee's trade or that the objective was to prevent nationalisation. The Tribunal upheld the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner.

Finding of the Court:

The Supreme Court held that the contribution to the Indian National Congress was not an allowable deduction under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, as it was not an expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the assessee's business.

Issues: Whether the contribution to the Indian National Congress was an allowable deduction under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

Ratio Decidendi: The expression "for the purpose of the business" is wider in scope than the expression "for the purpose of earning profits". Its range is wide: it may take in not only the day to day running of a business but also the rationalization of its administration and modernization of its machinery. The expenditure must be incidental to the business and must be necessitated or justified by commercial expediency. It must be directly and intimately connected with the business and be laid out by the taxpayer in his character as a trader.

Final Decision: The Supreme Court answered the question in the negative and held that the contribution to the Indian National Congress was not an allowable deduction under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE assessee, a public limited company, is a manufacturer and dealer, inter alia, in steel wire products. In the computation of the total income for the assessment year 1957-58 (corresponding to the accounting year ending with March 31, 1957), the assessee claimed the following amounts as deductions: (1) Contribution of Rs. 1,50,000, to the Indian National Congress. (2) Provision for payment of bonus amounting to Rs. 5,55,000, in addition to the actual payment of bonus during the accounting period, and (3) Anticipated wealth-tax liability amounting to Rs. 1,62,653.

( 2 ) THE Income-tax Officer allowed the first and the second claim but disallowed the third and completed the assessment some time in March, 1958. The assessee preferred an appeal against the order of assessment, before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, on or about April 8, 1958. During the pendency of the appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Income-tax Officer issued a notice, under Section 34 (1 ) (b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, on August 30, 1958, requiring the assessee to submit a revised return for the year 1957-58. The assessee filed a return on September 9, 1958, under protest and subject to objection as to the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer to issue such a notice. Thereafter, the Income-tax Officer wrote a letter, on September 12, 1958, to the assessee calling upon the assessee to explain how the contribution to the Indian National Congress could be claimed as an allowable deduction. The assessee replied to the letter, on September 19, 1958, taking up the position that the contribution was allowable as an expenditure under Section 10 (2) (xv), on the following lines of reasoning:" The Congress is a political party and in power ever since India attained independence in 1947. The company's memorandum of association authorises contributions to such parties. You will kindly recall the two recent decisions, one of the hon'ble High Court of Calcutta and the other by the Bombay High Court that donations by public companies to political organisations were intra vires and competent and not unlawful under the company law. Cultivation of the patronage and good grace of the political party in power amounts to lubricating the machinery for carrying on of the business like our clients ; more so in the cases of assessees like our clients whose activities are controlled, namely, even about the supply of raw materials, fabrication, disposal and price by Iron and Steel Control Order and who have to dance attendance on and explain their view point before a hierarchy of executives. Admittedly, the contribution was made not merely ex-gratia or merely by way of charity but was made by a public company with the prospect of promoting their innumerable business or trade interests. You are aware of the instances where mutual good relations and understanding resolve many a dispute, beget confidence and responsibility, promote expeditious disposal of the business and solution of problems and difficulties. The party in power has to offer the patronage of priorities, licences under the various laws and at various levels and stages. The contributions to such a party evince first the knowledge and belief of the contributor that the contribution is worth its while and secondly, that the contributor finds it prospective and conducive to its interest to make the contribution. Whatever be the ethics of such conduct, even a smile of a Minister or a nod or a frown of an executive authority amenable to a Minister either of a State or of the Centre amounts to a very great help for businessmen or industrialists in getting priorities, in resolving labour disputes, in getting licences and so on. This contribution was inspired by nothing else than motives of commercial expediency and for promotion of the company's business interests. Nationalisation is already in the air. The Imperial Bank has been nationalised, the insurance companies have been n














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top