SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 125

T.P.MUKHERJI
MATHURA PROSAD RAJGHARIA – Appellant
Versus
KANAILAL MULLICK – Respondent


T. P. MUKHERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal filed with the leave of the court under Section 417 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order of a Judge, Small Causes Court, Calcutta functioning as the appellate authority under Section 29 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act 1956. The appellant is a tenant who made a complaint to the Rent Controller against the landlords - the present respondents - to the effect that they had wilfully stopped the supply of filtered and unfilter- ed water to his premises, that the supply was comprised in the tenancy and is essential thereto.

( 2 ) THE Rent Controller acting under 8. 31 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act 1956 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) found that the allegation regarding Interference with the supply of filtered water had been proved and on this finding he imposed a fine of Rs. 200 on the landlords and directed them to deposit the amount in court within seven days. They were further directed to restore the supply of filtered water within 72 hours.

( 3 ) THE landlords took an appeal to the Chief Judge of the Court of Small Causes at Calcutta. The appeal was transferred to another Judge of the Court and





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top