SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 54

T.P.MUKHERJI
DEBENDRA NATH RAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DUTTA, D.P.Choudhary, TARAK NATH BANERJEE

T. P. MUKHERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule is directed against an order of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, whereby he has ordered that certain properties seized under a search warrant forwarded to him by the Presidency Magistrate, 21st Court of Bombay be sent to the Court wherefrom the warrant had emanated.

( 2 ) IN connection with a complaint under Sections 494, 495 and 420 Indian Penal Code filed in the Court of Presidency Magistrate at Bombay by one Smt. Raksha alias Rekha Rathindra Naty Roy against her husband Dr. R. N. Roy, a search warrant was prayed for, for recovery of movables comprising gold and silver ornaments, utensils and clothes etc. , from the house of Dr. R. N. Roy's father at Calcutta. In pursuance of the prayer the learned Presidency Magistrate of Bombay issued a warrant and forwarded the same to the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, for execution. The learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, on receipt of the warrant endorsed it in favour of the officcr-in-charge of the local police station and Unit officer accompanied by the brother of the complainant went to the house of Sri D. N. Roy, father of Dr. R. N. Roy and on the identification, the iden









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top