SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 103

DEEP NARAYAN SINHA, ARUN KUMAR MUKHERJEE
SUNIL KUMAR DEBNATH – Appellant
Versus
MINING AND ALLIED MACHINERY CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.CHATTERJEE, A.P.SARKAR, SALIL KUMAR DUTT

SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against an order passed by Banerjee, J. on the 16th February, 1966 for a Rule summarily, on the ground that the respondent appeared to be a Government company which is neither the Government nor a statutory body and so, not amenable to the writ jurisdiction. The learned Judge relied on his own judgment in Prafulla Kumar Sen v. Calcutta State Transport Corporation, AIR 1963 Cal 116 and refused to issue a Rule and dismissed the application. Before us, on the 19th of December, 1966 learned Advocate for all parties agreed that it would merely protract matters if we sent the case back to the court below for issuing a rule, but the more desirable course would be to allow the parties to file affidavits and then decide the matter on the merits. This was done, and we have heard the matter on the merits. The facts which have emerged are as follows: In the application, there were three petitioners, who are now the appellants before us. The respondent is the Mining and Allied Machinery Corporation Limited, Durgapur. In 1962 the Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. a Government company, in its coal Mining Machinery project started recruiting candidates with a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top