DEEP NARAYAN SINHA, ARUN KUMAR MUKHERJEE
SUNIL KUMAR DEBNATH – Appellant
Versus
MINING AND ALLIED MACHINERY CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against an order passed by Banerjee, J. on the 16th February, 1966 for a Rule summarily, on the ground that the respondent appeared to be a Government company which is neither the Government nor a statutory body and so, not amenable to the writ jurisdiction. The learned Judge relied on his own judgment in Prafulla Kumar Sen v. Calcutta State Transport Corporation, AIR 1963 Cal 116 and refused to issue a Rule and dismissed the application. Before us, on the 19th of December, 1966 learned Advocate for all parties agreed that it would merely protract matters if we sent the case back to the court below for issuing a rule, but the more desirable course would be to allow the parties to file affidavits and then decide the matter on the merits. This was done, and we have heard the matter on the merits. The facts which have emerged are as follows: In the application, there were three petitioners, who are now the appellants before us. The respondent is the Mining and Allied Machinery Corporation Limited, Durgapur. In 1962 the Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. a Government company, in its coal Mining Machinery project started recruiting candidates with a
Suprasad Mukherjee v. State Bank of India
Dr.Sudhir Chandra Neogy v. Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd.
Nagpur Electric Light and Power Co. Ltd. v. Shreepatirao
REFERRED TO : Prafulla Kumar Sen v. Calcutta State Transport Corporation
Corporation of the City of Nagpur v. Nagpur Electric Light and Power Co. Ltd.
Subodh Ranjan Ghosh v. Sindri Fertilisers and Chemicals Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.