SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Cal) 160

AMARESH ROY, S.N.BAGCHI
AWADH BEHARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKTI PRASANNA MUKHARJI, PRASUN CHANDRA GHOSH, PROMODE RANJAN ROY

AMARESH ROY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule was issued upon a revisional application made on behalf of the petitioner, Awadh Behari Singh, who has been convicted by a Magistrate, 1st Class at Siliguri for an alleged offence under Section 9 (a) of the Opium Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000 in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. That order of conviction and sentence was affirmed on appeal by the learned Sessions Judge of Jalpaiguri-Darjeeling.

( 2 ) THE petitioner Awadh Behari Singh, a member of the Indian Army being a Company Commander of the rank of a Naik in the 9th Grenadiers (Mewar ). He was arrested in a military compartment while he was travelling by the railways and was produced before the Magistrate at Siliguri on 29th of March, 1962. Allegations against him were that on search of his beddings in the military compartment, a packet containing about eleven seers of contraband opium was found for which he had no licence. On being produced before the Magistrate, the accused was granted bail of rupees 25,000 with two sureties of Rs. 12,500 each. By order dated the 12th of April, 1962, the learned Magi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top