SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Cal) 135

BIJAYESH MUKHERJI
BENGAL BUS SYNDICATE – Appellant
Versus
M. K. ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amarnath Dhole, Arun Kumar Dutta, BANKIM CHANDRA DUTT, KASHI KANTA MAITRA, Madan Mohan Saha

BIJAYESH MUKHERJI, J.

( 1 ) BY this rule obtained under Article 227 of the Constitution, Messrs. Bengal Bus Syndicate seeks reversal of the decision dated September 30, 1964, of a labour Court here, computing under S, 33-C, Sub-section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 14 of 1947, the monetary benefits payable by the Syndicate to its quondam employee, (a starter), Chandra Kant Misra, opposite party No. 2, as under:

Rs .

1. Back wages for 18 months from February 1, 1961 to mid-August 1962 at Rs. 100 a month 1,850. 00

2. Bonus for 1961 100. 00

3. Compensation for 10 years with bonus of Rs. 100 a year 13,000. 00

Total 14,950. 00

( 2 ) THE preliminary facts leading to such computation are not in the realm of dispute. On April 30, 1962, an industrial tribunal here recorded an award directing the Syndicate (i) to reinstate Chandra Kant to his former job, with continuity of service, and (ii) to pay him all back dues for the period of his forced unemployment within one month from the publication of the award. The award was published in the Calcutta Gazette dated July 19, 1962. See Part 1 thereof at pp. 2084-2090. The Syndicate defied the award. The State Government, therefore,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top