SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Cal) 200

D.N.SINHA, A.K.MUKHERJI
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL TOBACCO CO. OF INDIA LTD. – Respondent


SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) THE facts in this case are briefly as follows. The respondent company carries on the business of manufacturing cigarettes and tobacco at Agarpara in 24 Parganas and as such, they have to pay excise duty on the value of the cigarettes manufactured by it. In this case, we are not concerned with anything else. The levy of excise duty is controlled by me Central Excises and Salt Act (Act I of 1944) (hereinafter referred to as the "said Act") and the Central Excise Rules (hereinafter referred to as the "said Rules" ). Section 3 of the said Act provides that there shall be levied and collected in such manner as may be prescribed, duties of excise on all excisable goods other than salt, which are produced and manufactured in (India), and a duty on salt manufactured in, and imported by land into any part of India as, and at the rates, set forth in the First Schedule. It is not necessary to go into further details at present. It is sufficient to state that cigarettes manufactured in India have to pay excise duty. During the relevant period, namely the years 1955 to 1957, excise duty was to be levied on a slab system upon value of the goods manufactured. It was, therefore












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top