SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 198

P.B.MUKHARJI
EVEREST CINE CORPORATION (P)LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MINOR DAUGHTER KHUKU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amarnath Roy Chowdhury, Krishna Benode Ray

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 115 ot the Code of Civil Procedure. The two petitioners are the Everest Cine Corporation (Private) Ltd. and its Director B. Chandak. These peti-tioners were the defendants in a suit before the Small Cause Court, Calcutta. The plaintiff in that suit was one Anil Banerjee who died during the pendency of the Rule in this Court. The Rule here was issued on the 12th February, 1962 and was directed against the judgment of the Presidency Small Cause Court under Section 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act which set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Judge of the Small Cause Court.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case giving rise to this application may be stated briefly at the outset. The plaintiff, a Cine-Cameraman sued the two defendants for recovery of the sum of Rs. 2,000. The plaintiff's case is that on the 9th March, 1955 he was appointed as the Director of Photography for a film called "chalachal", under a written contract contained in a letter which is marked Ex. 2c and bearing the same date as the 9th March, 1955. The terms of the contract were that the plaintiff's engagement was to last for a pe













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top