SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 208

D.N.SINHA, S.A.MASUD
KALIPADA SINHA – Appellant
Versus
MAHALAXMI BANK LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gurudas Ghose, PRAVAS KUMAR SEN, SALIL KUMAR DUTT, Sudhangsu Bhusan Sen

SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure combined with Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE facts are shortly as follows: There was a Bank in Calcutta called the Mahalaxmi Bank Ltd, which had its head office at 135 Canning Street, Calcutta. Sometime before November, 1948 the said Bank suspended its business and went into moratorium under the provisions of Section 277 N of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, read with Section 153 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. On the 10th March, 1949 the Banking Companies Act, 1949, (Act X of 1949) (hereinafter referred to as the "said Act") came into force. Originally, the said Act did not contain any provisions as to the settlement of the list of debtors as is done in winding up proceedings. On or about the 30th December, 1953 the Banking Companies Amendment Act 1953 (Act LII of 1953) came into force and provisions as to settlement of the list of debtors were introduced in the said Act. Presently, 1 shall deal with the relevant provisions. On the 7th Tuna, 1954 the said Bank filed an application in this High Court under Section 45m (b) read with Section 45d (6) of the said Act for set







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top