HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Banerjee
SYED ABDUL MANSUR HABIBULLAH - Appellant
Versus
WEST BENGAL LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY - Respondent
. Of .
Decided On : February 26, 1965
Mandamus - West Bengal Legislative Assembly - Article 176, Article 194, Rule 16, Rule 17, Rule 18, Rule 19, Rule 20, Rule 22, Rule 23 - The court examined the constitutional provisions and rules governing the opening of the legislative session, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the Governor's address to the Legislature. It held that the failure to deliver the address orally was irregular but did not invalidate the subsequent proceedings. The court also highlighted the significance of the Governor's departure from the legislative chamber and the potential implications for the constitutional government.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the legality of the first session of the West Bengal Legislature in 1965-66, alleging that the Governor did not deliver the required address, and the subsequent proceedings were void. The court examined the constitutional provisions and rules governing the opening of the legislative session.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while the Governor's failure to deliver the address orally was irregular, it did not invalidate the subsequent proceedings. The court also highlighted the significance of the Governor's departure from the legislative chamber and the potential implications for the constitutional government.
Issues: The issues included the mandatory nature of the Governor's address, the constitutional significance of the Governor's departure from the legislative chamber, and the potential implications for the constitutional government.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Governor's address to the Legislature is mandatory, but the failure to deliver it orally, while irregular, did not invalidate the subsequent proceedings. The court also emphasized the potential implications of the Governor's departure from the legislative chamber for the constitutional government.
Final Decision: The court declined to issue a Rule as prayed for and dismissed the application, finding that the West Bengal Legislative Assembly had not been illegally functioning.
( 2 ) THE circumstances, in the background of which the petitioner has moved this Court, are hereinafter recounted in brief. The State of West Bengal has two Houses of Legislature, namely, the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly. Article 176 of the Constitution provides:" (1) At the commencement of the first session after each general election to the Legislative Assembly and at the commencement of the first session of each year the Governor shall address the Legislative Assembly or, in the case of State having a Legislative Council, both Houses assembled together and inform the Legislature of the causes of its summons. (2) Provision shall be made by the rules regulating the procedure of the House of either House for the allotment of time for discussion of the matters referred to in such address. "
( 3 ) CHAPTER V of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct and Business in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of Procedure), framed under Clause (1) of Article 208 of the Constitution, contains rules for Governor's address and messages to the Legislature, from which I need notice Rules 16, 17, 18, 19 (2) and (3), 20, 22 and 23. "16. (1) On the day and the hour appointed for the commencement and holding of the first session of the Assembly in each year not being the first meeting after a dissolution, or as soon thereafter as may be and in the case of a session after a dissolution on the first sitting of the Assembly after the election of the Speaker, the Governor will address the Assembly as required by Article 176 of the Constitution (2) After the delivery of the speech by the Governor, the Speaker shall report to the Assembly that the Governor had been please to make a speech and shall lay a copy of the speech on the Table. (3) On such report being made notice may be given of a motion that a respectful Address be presented to the Governor in reply to his speech expressing the thanks of the Assembly for the speech delivered by him. (4) The Speaker shall, in consultation with the leader of the House, allot time for the discussion of the matters referred to in Governor's Address. 17. On such day or days or part of any day, the House shall be at liberty to discuss the matters referred to in such Address on a Motion of Thanks moved by a member and seconded by another member. 18. Amendments may be moved to such motion by way of adding additional words at the end but not otherwise, on such notice being given as the Speaker may determine. 19. (2) The discussion on the Address may be postponed in favour of a Government Bill or other Government business on a motion being made that the discussion on the Address be adjourned to a subsequent day to be appointed by the Speaker. The Speaker shall forthwith put the question, no amendment or debate being allowed. (3) The discussion on the Address shall be interrupted in the course of a sitting by an adjournment motion under Rule 64. 20. The Chief Minister or any other Minister, whether he has previously taken part in the discussion or not, shall on behalf of the Government, have a general right of explaining the position of the Government at the end of the di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.