SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 116

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
D. N. Sinha, G. K. Mitter
LAL CHAND ROY - Appellant
Versus
NERODE KANTA GOSWAMY - Respondent
A. F. O. O.  231  Of  1964
Decided On : MAY 7, 1965

An arbitrator can award interest on the amount awarded up to the date of the decree but not thereafter. The court can award interest from the date of the decree.

Headnote:

ARBITRATION - INTEREST ON OWELTY MONEY - POWER OF ARBITRATOR - SECTION 29 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, 1940 - ARBITRATOR CAN AWARD INTEREST UP TO THE DATE OF DECREE BUT NOT THEREAFTER - COURT CAN AWARD INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF DECREE.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant and respondent jointly acquired three properties and had equal shares in them. A dispute arose between them regarding the partition of the properties and the claim of the appellant for excess payment made by him for the acquisition of one of the properties. The matter was referred to arbitration. The arbitrator made an award directing the appellant to pay owelty to the respondent and also awarded interest on the owelty money from the date of delivery of possession of the property allotted to the appellant till the date of payment.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the arbitrator had the power to award interest on the owelty money up to the date of the decree but not thereafter. The court further held that the court could award interest from the date of the decree.

Issues: Whether the arbitrator had the power to award interest on the owelty money after the date of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, which empowers the court to grant interest on the amount awarded from the date of the decree. The court held that this section does not apply to arbitration proceedings and therefore the arbitrator had no power to award interest from the date of the award.

Final Decision: The court set aside the award only to the extent of the award of interest after the passing of the decree. The court ordered that the owelty money would carry interest at the rate of six percent per annum from the date of delivery of possession of the property allotted to the appellant till the date of the judgment, and that the decretal amount for owelty would carry interest from the date of the judgment until payment, at the same rate of six percent per annum.

SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against an order of Mallick, J. dated August 21, 1964 by which he dismissed an application made by the appellant to correct, remit or set aside an award. The facts of the case are shortly as follows: The appellant and the respondent jointly acquired three properties, namely, premises Nos. 2a, Colonel Biswas Road, No. 89, Bepin Ghosal Road and No. 21, Taltolla Bazar Street. The parties had equal shares in the said properties. The petitioner claimed that he had made excess contribution for acquisition of one of the said properties and in effecting a partition of the properties, this claim should be kept in view. The respondent disputed the claim about excess payment. All matters in dispute between the parties relating to partition, including the claim for excess payment, were referred to the sole arbitration of Dr. P. C. Chunder by an agreement dated May 15, 1959. The relevant Clauses in the said agreement are Clauses 1, 5, 6 and 7 which are set out hereunder:"1. All matters, questions, disputes, differences and/or claims arising out of and/or concerning and/or in connection with and/or in consequence of or relating to the partition of the said properties including the claim of the said Lal Chand Roy for such excess contribution towards the costs of acquisition of the said premises No. 21, Taltala Bazar Street, Calcutta, be and are hereby referred to the sole arbitration of Dr. P. C. Chunder of No. 23, Nirmal Chunder Street, Calcutta. * * * * * 5. It is agreed that the premises No. 89 Bepin Ghosal Road shall be sold by the parties jointly to such party and for such price as the arbitrator shall direct and the sale proceeds shall be appropriated by Lal Chand Roy at the first instance towards his share which shall be taken into account by the arbitrator in making that division between the parties. 6. The arbitrator shall divide the properties into two lots and allot each of the parties one such lot. In making the division the arbitrator shall allot to Nerode Kanta Goswami the premises No. 21 Taltolla Bazar Street and to Lal Chand Roy No. 2a balance Biswas Road. 7. To equalise the value of the shares the arbitrator shall have power to award owelty. "the arbitrator made an award dated June 18, 1963. It will appear from the facts aforesaid that the agreement already provided as to who will get the respective premises, but the arbitrator was called upon to adjust the owelty that is to be paid by the respective parties. After valuation of the properties was effected by the Engineer appointed by consent of parties, the arbitrator allotted one property to each of the parties as provided in the agreement and adjusted the equities between the parties by directing a payment of Rs. 53,750 as owelty by the Appellant to the respondent. He further directed that separate possession of the respective allotments should be given within one week from the date of the confirmation of the award. To this part of the award, no objection has been taken. The objection centres round the following provision in the award:--"i further award and direct that the said owelty money will carry interest at 6% per annum from the date when the separate possession of 2a, Colonel Biswas Road is delivered to Sri Lal Chand Roy as aforesaid till the date of payment. "

( 2 ) AN application was made by the Appellant to set aside this award and it was contended that the award of interest cannot be sustained in law. The position that was taken in the Court below was that the arbitrator had no jurisdiction in law to award interest on the amount that has been awarded and reference was made to Section 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 which empowers the Court to grant interest on the amount awarded from the date of the decree. It was conceded that if the learned Judge set aside the award with regard to the amount of interest after the decree, but interest was granted by the Court under the decree, then no objection could be made. This offer howeve




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top